Date of Hearing: 18-02-2003 Date of Order: 08-04-2003 Petition No. 6 to 13/2002 |
IN THE MATTER OF : |
POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR VARIOUS PROPOSED HYDRO POWER PROJECTS BEING SET UP BY M/s TRIVENI ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LTD. IN PUNJAB. |
AND |
IN THE MATTER OF : |
Triveni Engineering & Industries Ltd. ...Petitioner |
VERSUS |
Punjab State Electricity Board & others ...Respondent |
PRESENT | R .S.Mann, CHAIRMAN S.K.Sharma, MEMBER L.S.Deol, MEMBER |
On behalf of the petitioner: | Sri B.K.Aggarwal, Chief of Operation. Sri Sanjiv Anand, Advocate. |
On behalf of Respondent PSEB: | Sri H.C.Sood, Chief Engineer/Commercial. Sri V.K.Shanan, Dy.Director/Sales. |
On behalf of the State Govt. and PEDA: | Sri S.S.Sekhon, Director/PEDA Sri A.K.Singla, Xen, Sri A.R..Takkar, Advocate. |
Petition No. 14/2002 |
IN THE MATTER OF : |
POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR BIOMASS POWER PROJECT BEING SET UP BY M/s. MALWA POWER PRIVATE LIMITED. |
M/s. Malwa Power Private Ltd., New Delhi ...Petitioner |
VERSUS |
Punjab State Electricity Board & others ...Respondent |
PRESENT | R .S.Mann, CHAIRMAN S.K.Sharma, MEMBER L.S.Deol, MEMBER |
On behalf of the petitioner: | Ms. M.K.Randhawa, Advocate. Sri K.L.Bansal, Director, Malwa Power Pvt. Ltd. |
On behalf of Respondent PSEB: | Sri H.C.Sood, Chief Engineer/Commercial. Sri V.K.Shanan, Dy.Director/Sales. |
On behalf of the State Govt. and PEDA: | Sri S.S.Sekhon, Director/PEDA Sri A.K.Singla, Xen, Sri A.R..Takkar, Advocate. |
Petition No. 15/2002 |
IN THE MATTER OF : |
POWER PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR VARIOUS PROPOSED HYDRO POWER PROJECTS BEING SET UP BY M/s UTILITY POWER TECH LTD. NOIDA IN PUNJAB. |
AND |
IN THE MATTER OF : |
M/s Utility Power Tech Limited ...Petitioner |
VERSUS |
Punjab State Electricity Board & others ...Respondent |
PRESENT | R .S.Mann, CHAIRMAN S.K.Sharma, MEMBER L.S.Deol, MEMBER |
On behalf of the petitioner: | Sri M.L.Sharma, RM. Sri Rajiv Sharma Sri R.K.Bhateja |
On behalf of Respondent PSEB: | Sri H.C.Sood, Chief Engineer/Commercial. Sri V.K.Shanan, Dy.Director/Sales. |
On behalf of the State Govt. and PEDA: | Sri S.S.Sekhon, Director/PEDA Sri A.K.Singla, Xen, Sri A.R..Takkar, Advocate. |
Petition No. 17/2002 |
IN THE MATTER OF : |
Fixation of the Tariff for purchase of power from the Developers of Micro Hydel Projects and to review some of the Terms and conditions of agreements already signed with such Independent Power Producers. |
AND |
IN THE MATTER OF : |
Punjab State Electricity Board ...Petitioner |
VERSUS |
M/s Gill Power Generation Corporation & fourteen others ...Respondent |
PRESENT | R .S.Mann, CHAIRMAN S.K.Sharma, MEMBER L.S.Deol, MEMBER |
On behalf of the PSEB: | Sri H.C.Sood, Chief Engineer/Commercial. Sri V.K.Shanan, Dy.Director/Sales. |
On behalf of M/s Gill Power Gen. Co.: | Sri.A.S.Gill, Director |
On behalf of : | |
M/s Punjab Hydro Power Ltd
} M/s Aqua Power Limited } M/s Kotla Hydro Power Limited } |
Sri Druv Mehta, Advocate Sri R.K.Jindal,Director, KHPL. Sri Vivek Bakshi, Company Secretary, Polyplex ltd. |
Petition No. 24/2002 |
IN THE MATTER OF : |
Approval of Power Tariff for proposed small Hydro Power Projects on UBDC Canal System, Ghaggar Brangh Canal System and Bathinda Branch Canal System in Punjab. |
AND |
IN THE MATTER OF : |
M/s Polyplex Corporation Limited
Noida ...Petitioner |
VERSUS |
Punjab State Electricity Board and others ...Respondent |
PRESENT | R .S.Mann, CHAIRMAN S.K.Sharma, MEMBER L.S.Deol, MEMBER |
On behalf of the petitioner: | Sri Vivek Bakshi. Sri.Rajesh Jindal. |
On behalf of Respondent PSEB: | Sri H.C.Sood, Chief Engineer/Commercial. Sri V.K.Shanan, Dy.Director/Sales. |
On behalf of the State Govt. & PEDA: | Sri A.R.Takkar, Advocate, with Sri S.S.Sekhon, Director and Sri A.K.Singla, Xen. |
All the above mentioned petitions pertain to the matter of
signing of Power purchase agreements between Private Power Developers and the
Punjab State Electricity board. Except for petition No 17 of 2002, all the
petitions have been filed by Private power Developers. Petition No. 17 of 2002
has been filed by the PSEB in which prayer for review has been made for the rate
and some of the terms & conditions in the PPAs already signed by the Board
with some Private Power Developer. Since the matters involved in all these
petitions are quite similar in nature, all the petitions were ordered by the
Commission to be clubbed together and these are thus being disposed of by the
single order. Considering the issues involved, the Commission ordered that in
every case, Punjab Energy Development Agency (PEDA) and Government of Punjab be
made parties in addition to the Punjab State Electricity Board (wherever these
were not parties).
2. The substantive issue involved in these petitions is
regarding the benefits and Incentives to be allowed to the Private Power
Developers through these PPAs, as per the NRSE policy of the Government of
Punjab notified in July. 2001. This policy was Formulated by the State
Government for the promotion of energy generation through non- conventional
sources of energy. This policy of the State Govt. was in fact based on a Similar
policy approved by the Government of India, Ministry of Non-Conventional Energy
Sources. The main objectives of the policy notified by the State Government are
to enhance the contribution of renewable energy, to reduce environmental
pollution caused by the fossil fuels, to create conditions conducive for the
involvement of private investors in NRSE projects and to create direct and
indirect and indirect employment opportunities.Under this policy, incentives are
offered to the investors for the setting up of power projects. PEDA is to
provide complete project support and facilitation services and for all practical
purposes, PEDA is to act as the Nodal Agency for promoting such projects. In
fact the policy reflects the commitment of the Govt, to promote environment
friendly power generation in the larger public interest with the intention to
attract private investment in the power sector and to create direct/indirect
employment in the State.
3. While these petitions were pending before the Commission,
the State Government sent a directive to the Commission u/s 39 of the ERC Act,
vide Notification No.3/119/2002-STE(3)/Policy, dated 28th October, 2002 which is
reproduced as under:-
"In exercise of the powers conferred by section 39 of the Electricity Regulatory Commission Act, 1998 (central Act No. 14 of 1998) and all other powers enabling him in this behalf, the Governor of Punjab is pleased to direct the Punjab State Electricity Regulatory Commission for compliance of the policy issued by the Government of Punjab, Department of Science, Technology, Environment and Non-Conventional Energy, Notification No. 10/85/2000-STE(3)/1476, dated the 24th July, 2001 published in the Government Gazette Part I, dated the 3rd August,2001(SRVN 12,1923 SAKA)."
All the parties were asked by the Commission to file their comments/objections on the directive received from the Government. The PSEB filed its objections wherein it was stated that rate of Rs.3.01 per unit for purchase of power allowed in the policy with annual escalation of 5% in the initial years is very high. However, the PSEB stated that it will have no objection to purchase power at this rate provided this is approved by the Commission and this rate of purchase of power is factored into the ARR (Annual Revenue Requirement of the Board. The PSEB also objected to some other terms & conditions of the proposed PPAs.
On February 18,2003, the Commission received another reference
from the State Govt., which is reproduced below:-
"In continuation to this office DO No. PSIP/2003/74, dated 31.1.2003 and with reference to order of the Commission dated 3.2.2003 (copy enclosed) the matter regarding purchase of power from Mini Hydel Projects was reviewed in a meeting held on 11..2.2003. The following decisions taken in the meeting are re-produced below for reference of the Regulatory Commission. These decisions would be applicable to all projects set up under NRSE Policy-2001 through PEDA:-
The above decisions of the Govt. may be considered by the Commission for tariff fixation. In view of the above decisions issuing of directions to PSEB under Section 78A of the ESA 1948 is not required."
On delebrations with all the parties and upon their unanimous
consent, the Commission decided that the letter of February 18, 2003 from the
State Government may be treated as an amendment of the earlier directive sent to
the Commission by the State Government.
4. During further hearings before the Commission, all the
Petitioners and Respondents expressed their clear and full agreement to the rate
and terms & conditions to be incorporated in the PPA’s as reiterated through
the two directives of the State Government sent to the Commission. In its
written concurrence, the PSEB stated that the entire policy as amended by the
directives of the Government should be applied as a complete package. Though
this reference itself, PSEB sought to raise some additional objections on points
which are not strictly covered by the NRSE policy. Upon being pressed by the
Commission to state categorically whether the PSEB was a party in the
celiberations at the State Government level after which the directives were
issued to the Commission of February 18, 2003, the representatives of the PSEB
replied in the affirmative. The representatives of the PSEB also conceded that
the Board was bound by the latest directives of the State Government.
As all parties in these petitions have unreservedly agreed to
draw up and sign the PPA’s as per the NRSE policy of July, 2001 as modified by
the two directives received by the Commission from the Governments, the only
points which remain to be examined by the Commission are whether the directives
of the State Government are in order and are binding on the Commission as per
Section 39 of the ERC Act, 1998 and and whether the rates allowed for power
purchase as per this policy are fit to be passed on to the ARR.
That the two directives of the State Government are in
conformity with Section 39 of the ERC Act, 1998 is clear from the facts that the
directives have been sent in writing and they pertain to a matter of policy
involving public interest viz. the implementation of the NRSE policy framed by
the State Govt.
In sub-para (i) of its letter of February 18,2003, the
Government of Punjab has directed that the Commission may permit PSEB to buy
power from the Developers at the rates provided in the NRSE policy and the full
cost of the power so purchased may be passed on to the consumers through the
ARR. For the reasons given in para 6 below, the Commission decides that costs on
this account could be passed on to the ARR for the relevant year.
As per sub-para (ii) of the Government letter dated February
18, 2003, the Government has directed that except for PPAs already signed with
PEDA, the cost for transmission lines/works required to be laid for avacuating
this power to the nearest PSEB Grid Sub Station should be borne by the
Developers. Since the private Developers before the Commission have no objection
to this stipulation, the Commission endorses the same.
As per sub-para (v) of the Govt. letter dated February 18,
2003, the Government have stipulated that the Developers may be allowed to
install suitable metering at their generating end to record the generation made
for sale to PSEB and billing be done on the basis of readings recorded by the
meter installed at the generating end the power available for sale to PSEB to be
included in the ARR shall be units so generated and recorded less 5% for
transmission losses. None of the parties before us have objection to the
contents of this para. However, the Commission feels that it is not desirable
for the Government to lay down a definite figure for transmission losses to be
passed on to the consumers. Transmission losses which the consumers should be
required to bear are only the actual transmission losses as claimed by the PSEB
and finally determined by the Commission. For a particular year, transmission
losses may be above or below the figure of 5%. The Commission accordingly
determines that transmission losses to be allowed would be as per the actual
losses for each year. The Commission feels that by this modification the
interests of the consumers will be safe guarded and none of the parties in these
petitions stand to lose.
6. Many of the Private Developers have taken effective steps
including commitment of funds, towards the implementation of these projects. In
some cases, even PPAs were signed between these parties and the PSEB. It will
thus be not fair or appropriate to change the rate of purchase of power on any
ground more so when the rate of sale of electricity was prefixed in the tenders
invited by Govt. as per provisions of NRSE policy. The Commission has, however,
noted that the PPAs are for 20 years extendable for another 10 years through
mutual agreement. The rate of purchase of power in respect of old Projects is
301 paise/unit with base year 200-01 to be increased by 5% every year up to
2004-05. The rate of purchase of power in respect of new Projects is 301
paise/unit with base year 2001-02 to be increased by 3% on yearly basis up to 5
years. Thereafter the rate is to remain fixed for the balance years of the
contract. The Commission, therefore, is of the opinion that the rates of
purchase of power which may appear to be high in the initial years may prove
competitive and highly beneficial in the later years of the duration of the
PPAs, keeping in view the incremental cost of power involved in subsequent years
of requirement. Thus by allowing these rates, the interests of the consumers
will be well served. Moreover, the PSEB is already purchasing power from other
co-generation producers and other such sources at the same rates.
7. The Commission accordingly decides that PPAs in all cases be
approved as per the directions of the Government dated October 28, 2002 as
amended vide their reference dated February 18, 2003 except that the clause
pertaining to 5% losses be amended to state that each year only assessed
transmission losses be allowed to the PSEB subject to adjustment based on
actuals. PEDA & PSEB may also ensure that during the period PPAs are valid,
the private parties will produce power using only non-conventional sources for
which the projects have been approved. Also in order to protect the interests of
the PSEB and consumers in general, PEDA and Govt. may take suitable steps to
ensure that the developers continue to supply powe5r at prescribed rates during
the entire period of contract and NRSE policy is implements. The PSEB will also
ensure that there is uniformity in respect of all clauses of PPA for all parties
falling under same categories under NRSE policy of the Government.
Place : Chandigarh Dated : April 8, 2003